tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post528057655710610006..comments2024-03-27T02:16:12.946-07:00Comments on QUANTUM TANTRA: Does Consciousness Create Reality?nick herberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12806604589435880363noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-50553204895080696302014-07-31T16:31:24.294-07:002014-07-31T16:31:24.294-07:00Hi Nick
helmut Schmidt (parapsi)found a kind of w...Hi Nick<br /><br />helmut Schmidt (parapsi)found a kind of wave reduction on observing mind matter interaction data.<br />The psi data only coming into existance at the time of observation! Found by'scrammbling'the baseline data prior to observing.<br /><br />TonyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-79480859986830187662012-05-30T07:09:59.100-07:002012-05-30T07:09:59.100-07:00Mind (that can create an intentional thought) is n...Mind (that can create an intentional thought) is not the same as consciousness. As far as I understand it, consciousness is something behind the mind (ego), which mind can sometimes obscure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-60744035332939439262012-04-25T14:34:38.783-07:002012-04-25T14:34:38.783-07:00We are all one if you truely believe in the big ba...We are all one if you truely believe in the big bang theroy. therefore we are connected to everything through energy and vibrations. When we are thinking positive we give off positive energy causing the energy around us to be affected. When the bang acutally happened nothing really changed it all simply got spread out. Are consciousness is one ultimate thinker or creater. Our godAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-52462162907796743002010-02-28T13:55:38.453-08:002010-02-28T13:55:38.453-08:00*shouldn't be*shouldn't bemuzuzuzushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03662316983453845369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-37076495775618565222010-02-28T13:52:47.430-08:002010-02-28T13:52:47.430-08:00NOT duality, but polarity with what we can call in...NOT duality, but polarity with what we can call individual consciousness/GC ?<br /><br />That with entheogens, and other 'nonordinary' states of consciousness we can feel this aspect of 'ourselves' GC.<br /><br />Integration then is not wanting (or I believe shouldn't me) to escape to GC for-ever and ever, but to have deeper insight OF this polaritymuzuzuzushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03662316983453845369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-43198988760409021072010-02-28T13:45:46.620-08:002010-02-28T13:45:46.620-08:00Conciousness is everywhere. The Grand Consciousnes...Conciousness is everywhere. The Grand Consciousness "GC" fills all of the reality. Brains or reducion-valve-receivers for the cosmic consciousness are for individual experience. The all pervading enjoys this game and even when the receiver fails, the individual sense of experience persists,even though many prior experiences are forgotten. These consciouness reducing agents produce Dr.Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13402889216336155747noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-72746839188722076932010-01-11T07:28:27.938-08:002010-01-11T07:28:27.938-08:00The way I am understanding it--the knower is the k...The way I am understanding it--the knower is the known, so for example, if I have an image of you that is negative that is how I see you, experience you<br />Does this mean my POSTIVE image of you would be the 'truth'?<br /><br />Well my positive image could be about Hitler!!!<br /><br />I know this--when I have taken entheogens I seem to see THROUGH--through to a dynamic that is much muzuzuzushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03662316983453845369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-77204998239514275982010-01-11T07:21:57.301-08:002010-01-11T07:21:57.301-08:00Consciousness DOES indeed create reality. However,...Consciousness DOES indeed create reality. However, it only creates one's own reality. It does not create ultimate reality. It makes your own reality tangible. If I was asleep, does this mean that my waking friend next to me doesn't exist? To me, yes, he does not exist. But he is still in existence.<br /><br />My two cents.O.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-9836517963304362632009-12-18T09:35:27.352-08:002009-12-18T09:35:27.352-08:00Hi Nick
According to John Wheeler:
Directly opp...Hi Nick <br /><br />According to John Wheeler:<br /><br />Directly opposite to the concept of universe as machine built on law is the vision of a world self-synthesized. On this view, the notes struck out on a piano by the observer participants of all times and all places, bits though they are in and by themselves, constitute the great wide world of space and time and things. <br /><br />And graham smethamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09039533727087278642noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-80555928386802463422009-12-10T13:14:44.261-08:002009-12-10T13:14:44.261-08:00What if instead of consciousness causing a collaps...What if instead of consciousness causing a collapse of the wave function, 'consciousness itself' is manifestation of the collapse of a WF? I would propose then that there is something pre-conscious which causes what we recognize as consciousness (and therefore our consciousness/awareness simply observes the occurence).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-2788704719893928762009-11-19T01:00:18.922-08:002009-11-19T01:00:18.922-08:00Hi Nick,
I would also add Dean Radin's quantu...Hi Nick,<br /><br />I would also add Dean Radin's quantum experiments with meditators. He did a study in 2008 <i>(Radin, D. I. (2008). Testing nonlocal observation as a source of intuitive knowledge. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing. 4(1), 25-35)</i> which yielded intriguing results suggesting that directly observing a slit with your "minds eye" (it was not really the Torhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00832780160218654422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-74907798027489846472009-11-08T23:19:34.654-08:002009-11-08T23:19:34.654-08:00Henry Stapp once stated the measurement problem th...Henry Stapp once stated the measurement problem this way (I paraphrase): The central problem in quantum theory is the status of non-human observed happenings. My position is that the measurement problem is a real problem but none of the solutions offered are satisfactory.<br /><br />Have not read "Irreducible Mind" but am aware of work in parapsychology--notable "autonomic nick herberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12806604589435880363noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-46183724974943719662009-11-08T22:06:13.537-08:002009-11-08T22:06:13.537-08:00Hi again Nick,
Are you familiar with the book &quo...Hi again Nick,<br />Are you familiar with the book "Irreducible Mind"?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08264546770441694397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-82572530874897662852009-11-08T22:04:04.913-08:002009-11-08T22:04:04.913-08:00Hi Nick,
Interesting post! I was wondering, thoug...Hi Nick, <br />Interesting post! I was wondering, though, if you'd care to comment on what Henry Stapp wrote in response to a question from philosopher John Searle about the pre-life universe:<br /><br />Thus, motivated by the desire for a non-anthropocentric ontology some<br />physicists have tried---intensively---to introduce some sort of "purely physical" process that will Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08264546770441694397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-20633837678162698322009-11-05T03:31:18.036-08:002009-11-05T03:31:18.036-08:00somwe thoughts come to mind:
what IS consciousne...somwe thoughts come to mind:<br /><br /> what IS consciousness?<br /><br />what IS matter?<br /><br />Can Fractal mathematics help explain this 'problem'?<br /><br />Is 'coming down' from DMT etc some kind of 'collapse of the WAVE function'?muzuzuzushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03662316983453845369noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-54390812447046649302009-11-03T22:14:07.018-08:002009-11-03T22:14:07.018-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.trixcleverspacealienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10033263223749819540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5695539920543910693.post-62779535057307590902009-11-03T07:26:24.211-08:002009-11-03T07:26:24.211-08:00Hi, Nick--
Could I propose a related question?...Hi, Nick--<br /> Could I propose a related question? How much consciousness would it take to create reality? If a physicist can collapse the wave function, that is the most extreme form of consciousness we can bring to bear on the problem, because the physicist presumably understands the significance of what has been observed. There is a whole range of lesser consciousness that can easily Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com